Complementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: Reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments

Primary tabs

Stachowicz, J. J., Best, R. J., Bracken, M. E. S., & Graham, M. H. (2008). Complementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: Reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(48), 18842-18847. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806425105
Metadata
TitleComplementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: Reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments
AuthorsJ. Stachowicz, J. Best, S. Bracken, H. Graham
AbstractMounting concern over the loss of marine biodiversity has increased the urgency of understanding its consequences. This urgency spurred the publication of many short-term studies, which often report weak effects of diversity (species richness) driven by the presence of key species (the sampling effect). Longer-term field experiments are slowly accumulating, and they more often report strong diversity effects driven by species complementarity, calling into question the generality of earlier findings. However, differences among study systems in which short- and long-term studies are conducted currently limit our ability to assess whether these differences are simply due to biological or environmental differences among systems. In this paper, we compared the effect of intertidal seaweed species richness on biomass accumulation in mesocosms and field experiments using the same pool of species. We found that seaweed species richness increased biomass accumulation in field experiments in both short (2-month) and long (3-year) experiments, although effects were stronger in the longterm experiment. In contrast, richness had no effect in mesocosm experiments, where biomass accumulation was completely a function of species identity. We argue that the short-term experiments, like many published experiments on the topic, detect only a subset of possible mechanisms that operate in the field over the longer term because they lack sufficient environmental heterogeneity to allow expression of niche differences, and they are of insufficient length to capture population-level responses, such as recruitment. Many published experiments, therefore, likely underestimate the strength of diversity on ecosystem processes in natural ecosystems. © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA.
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Date2008
Volume105
Issue48
Start page18842
End page18847
ISSN00278424
Subjectsarticle, biodiversity, biomass, ecosystem, field experiment, intertidal species, marine species, mesocosm, nonhuman, population, priority journal, sampling, seaweed, species diversity, species identification, species richness, Animals, California, Environment, Marine Biology, Population Dynamics, Seawater, Tidal Waves, algae
NoteCited By (since 1996):33 Seaweeds, CODEN: PNASA

Bookmark

Bookmarks: